Is it moral to have a really big lunch? By big, I mean really big- like a thirty-seven-course lunch and thirteen wines. No matter your initial reaction, the answer is not as obvious as you think. In The New Yorker , Jim Harrison's article "Annals of Eating A Really Big Lunch" argues that over-consuming massive amounts of food might not be as horrible as society assumes . Harrison recounts- on many occasions- his lavish gluttony, including times when he was not even hungry . This is okay, he argues, because life is far too short to not indulge in the most luxurious aspects of life. He says it best: "Like sex, bathing, sleeping, and drinking, the effects of food don't last. The patterns are repeated but finite. Life is a near-death experience, and our devious minds will do anything to make it interesting." I would like to counter this with the perspective of farmers like Kurt Timmermeister and Andrea Crawford . They prefer to live, consume, and...